Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12203686›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2002

Carpal tunnel syndrome modifies sensory hand cortical somatotopy: a MEG study.

Franca Tecchio, Luca Padua, Irene Aprile, Paolo Maria Rossini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Carpal tunnel syndrome impairs index finger responses to unpredictable perturbations.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franca TecchioIFN-CNR, Rome, Italy. tecchio@iess.rm.cnr.it
Luca Padua
Irene Aprile
Paolo Maria Rossini
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITIstituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult somatosensory system has shown reorganizational abilities at cortical and subcortical levels after peripheral nerve lesions. In the present study the effects of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are investigated as reflected on the somatotopy of the primary cortical hand representation. Position and intensity of cortical sources activated by the separate electrical stimulation of median nerve and Digits 1, 3, and 5 of both affected and non-affected hands are evaluated by magnetoencephalographic (MEG) technique. Correlation of MEG results with patient-, physician- and neurophysiological-oriented evaluations of CTS was carried out. Patients showed changes in cortical hand somatotopy in strict relationship to self-referred assessment of symptoms and hand disability in daily activities, including: 1) a more extended representation of the affected hand when paresthesias prevailed; and 2) a more restricted representation due to lateral shift of the little finger was observed when pain symptoms dominated the clinical picture. Contralateral to the side of CTS, the cortical sources activated by Digit 5-stimulation appeared significantly enhanced with respect to contralateral ones from non-affected hand. When comparing the amplitude of peripheral sensory nerve action potentials of median and ulnar nerves to that of cortical responses (i.e., ECD strengths of M20 and M30 components after stimulation of Digits 3 and 5), a significant selective amplification of M30 with respect to M20 and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) appeared during Digit 3 stimulation compared to that observed for Digit 5. This has been interpreted as a central magnification mechanism in brain responsiveness, possibly revealing a safety factor enabling sensory perception despite the small peripheral signal due to nerve trunk dysfunction. Hum.

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetoencephalographyAdultCarpal Tunnel SyndromeCerebral CortexEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleFunctional LateralityHandHumansMaleMedian NerveMiddle AgedReference Values

Identifiers

PMID12203686
PMCPMC6871819
OpenAlexW1998913607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.