Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12202552›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2002

Identification of Anaplasma phagocytophila (formerly Ehrlichia phagocytophila) variants in blood from sheep in Norway.

Snorre Stuen, Ingrid Van De Pol, Karin Bergström, Leo M Schouls

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular detection and characterization ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  2. EAVLD 2024 - 7Italian journal of food safety · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection and Genotypic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Comparative Whole Genome Analysis of anPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Enlisting thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. ExperimentalFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  10. Molecular prevalence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Snorre StuenDepartment of Sheep and Goat Research, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Sandnes, Norway. snoore.Stuen@veths.no
Ingrid Van De Pol
Karin Bergström
Leo M Schouls
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLSwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 41 blood samples were collected from 40 Anaplasma phagocytophila-infected sheep in 11 sheep flocks from four different counties of southern Norway. The presence and nature of the Anaplasma species were identified by microscopic detection of morulae, PCR, reverse line blot hybridization, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. A. phagocytophila was identified in all of the samples, and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene revealed the presence of four variants of A. phagocytophila. Two of these variants have been described before, but two were newly identified 16S rRNA variants of this species. A. phagocytophila variant 1 was found in nine flocks, A. phagocytophila variant 2 was found in four flocks, the A. phagocytophila prototype was found in two flocks, and A. phagocytophila variant 5 was found in one flock. In two flocks, some sheep were infected with A. phagocytophila variant 1, whereas others were infected with A. phagocytophila variant 2, and in three animals a double infection with two variants was registered. Analyses of the blood samples revealed that blood from sheep infected with A. phagocytophila variant 2 contained nearly twice as many neutrophils and eight times as many Anaplasma-infected neutrophils as blood from sheep infected with the A. phagocytophila variant 1. Furthermore, only 43% of the A. phagocytophila variant 2-infected sheep displayed antibody responses in an immune fluorescence assay, whereas 93% of the sheep with the A. phagocytophila variant 1-infected sheep were seropositive.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesBase SequenceBloodCulture MediaDNA, RibosomalMolecular Sequence DataNorwayNucleic Acid HybridizationPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASheepCulture MediaDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID12202552
PMCPMC130712
OpenAlexW2140869291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.