Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12199661›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2002

A qualitative exploration of treatment decision-making role preference in adult asthma patients.

Ann-Louise Caress, Karen Luker, Ashley Woodcock, Kinta Beaver

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008
    Article
  10. Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2007
    Article
  11. Article
  12. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2004
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann-Louise CaressSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. ann.caress@man.ac.uk
Karen Luker
Ashley Woodcock
Kinta Beaver
University of Manchester · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore preferred treatment decision-making roles, and rationales for role preference, and to identify perceived facilitators to and barriers from attaining preferred role.

designQualitative design. SETTING AND

participantsOne secondary care and four primary care sites in North-west England. Purposive sample of 32 adult asthma patients with varied socio-economic backgrounds and disease severity.

methodsTape-recorded focused-conversation style interviews. Interview topic guide derived from the literature. Sort cards employed to provide the focus for exploration of role preferences.

resultsActive (n = 7), collaborative (n = 11) and passive (n = 14) decisional role preferences were identified. Respondents cited level of knowledge; trust; duration of condition; severity of condition at the decisional juncture; lifelong nature of asthma; a perception that 'it is my body'; characteristics of the individual and their response to health professionals as influencing role preference. Perceived facilitators and barriers to participation included condition-related knowledge, practical issues (e.g. lack of time during consultation) and clinicians' interpersonal skills.

conclusionsMost respondents wished to contribute to or feel involved in treatment decision-making, but not necessarily to control it. Some hindrances to participation would be amenable to intervention. The quality of the provider-patient relationship is central to facilitating participation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaAttitude to HealthEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID12199661
PMCPMC5060151
OpenAlexW2100950656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.