Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12197983›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of public health2002

Effectiveness of a worksite intervention to reduce an occupational exposure: the Minnesota wood dust study.

DeAnn Lazovich, David L Parker, Lisa M Brosseau, F Thomas Milton, Siobhan K Dugan, Wei Pan, Lynette Hock

Abstract readClinical TrialEvaluation StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of public health, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Primary prevention: exposure reduction, skin exposure and respiratory protection.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Small business owners' health and safety intentions: a cross-sectional survey.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2005
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

DeAnn LazovichDivision of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA. lazovich@epi.umn.edu
David L Parker
Lisa M Brosseau
F Thomas Milton
Siobhan K Dugan
Wei Pan
Lynette Hock

Funding

WOOD DUST INTERVENTION STUDY FOR SMALL BUSINESSR01OH003408 · OH · MINNESOTA STATE DEPT OF HEALTH · PI PARKER, DAVID L. · 1995 to 1998
–
NIOSH CDC HHS 5 R01 OH03408NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH003408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assessed the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce wood dust, a carcinogen, by approximately 26% in small woodworking businesses.

methodsWe randomized 48 businesses to an intervention (written recommendations, technical assistance, and worker training) or comparison (written recommendations alone) condition. Changes from baseline in dust concentration, dust control methods, and worker behavior were compared between the groups 1 year later.

resultsAt follow-up, workers in intervention relative to comparison businesses reported greater awareness, increases in stage of readiness, and behavioral changes consistent with dust control. The median dust concentration change in the intervention group from baseline to follow-up was 10.4% (95% confidence interval = -28.8%, 12.7%) lower than the change in comparison businesses.

conclusionsWe attribute the smaller-than-expected reduction in wood dust to the challenge of conducting rigorous intervention effectiveness research in occupational settings.

Indexed as

WoodAdultAir Pollutants, OccupationalDustEnvironmental MonitoringGuidelines as TopicHumansIndustryInhalation ExposureInservice TrainingMaximum Allowable ConcentrationMiddle AgedMinnesotaOccupational ExposurePilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationAir Pollutants, OccupationalDust

Identifiers

PMID12197983
PMCPMC1447268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.