Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12193624›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2002

Role of ppGpp in rpoS stationary-phase regulation in Escherichia coli.

Matthew Hirsch, Thomas Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. RpoS and the bacterial general stress response.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Dissecting the Fitness Costs of Complex Mutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DksA and ppGpp Regulate the σJournal of bacteriology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Stress sigma factor RpoS degradation and translation are sensitive to the state of central metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew HirschDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, West Virginia University Health Sciences Center, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, USA.
Thomas Elliott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial sigma factor RpoS is strongly induced under a variety of stress conditions and during growth into stationary phase. Here, we used rpoS-lac fusions in Escherichia coli to investigate control acting at the level of RpoS synthesis, which is especially evident when cells approach stationary phase in rich medium. Previous work has shown that the small molecule ppGpp is required for normal levels of RpoS in stationary phase. Despite the attraction of a model in which the ppGpp level controls stationary-phase induction of RpoS, careful measurement of rpoS-lac expression in a mutant lacking ppGpp showed similar effects during both exponential growth and stationary phase; the main effect of ppGpp was on basal expression. In addition, a modest regulatory defect was associated with the mutant lacking ppGpp, delaying the time at which full expression was achieved by 2 to 3 h. Deletion analysis showed that the defect in basal expression was distributed over several sequence elements, while the regulatory defect mapped to the region upstream of the rpoS ribosome-binding site (RBS) that contains a cis-acting antisense element. A number of other genes that have been suggested as regulators of rpoS were tested, including dksA, dsrA, barA, ppkx, and hfq. With the exception of the dksA mutant, which had a modest defect in Luria-Bertani medium, none of these mutants was defective for rpoS stationary-phase induction. Even a short rpoS segment starting at 24 nucleotides upstream of the AUG initiation codon was sufficient to confer substantial stationary-phase regulation, which was mainly posttranscriptional. The effect of RBS-proximal sequence was independent of all known trans-acting factors, including ppGpp.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCulture MediaEscherichia coliGene DeletionGuanosine TetraphosphateLac OperonMolecular Sequence DataPromoter Regions, GeneticRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSigma FactorBacterial ProteinsCulture MediadksA protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGuanosine TetraphosphateRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSigma Factorsigma factor KatF protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID12193624
PMCPMC135317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.