Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12190333›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2002

Theoretical predictions of drug absorption in drug discovery and development.

Patric Stenberg, Christel A S Bergström, Kristina Luthman, Per Artursson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Structure and dynamics of cholic acid and dodecylphosphocholine-cholic acid aggregates.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2010
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2008
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patric StenbergDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Christel A S Bergström
Kristina Luthman
Per Artursson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical development of new drugs is often terminated because of unfavourable pharmacokinetic properties such as poor intestinal absorption after oral administration. Intestinal permeability and solubility are two of the most important factors that determine the absorption properties of a compound. Efficient and reliable computational models that predict these properties as early as possible in drug discovery and development are therefore desirable. In this review, we first discuss the implementation of predictive models of intestinal drug permeability and solubility in drug discovery and development. Secondly, we discuss the mechanisms of intestinal drug permeability and computational methods that can be used to predict it. We then discuss factors influencing drug solubility and models for predicting it. We finally speculate that once these and other predictive computational models are implemented in drug discovery and development, these processes will become much more effective. Further, an increased fraction of drug candidates that are less likely to fail during clinical development will be selected.

Indexed as

Drug DesignBiological TransportHumansIntestinal AbsorptionModels, BiologicalPermeabilityPharmaceutical PreparationsSolubilityWaterPharmaceutical PreparationsWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.