Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12187959›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2002

Immunohistochemical markers for prognosis of ependymal neoplasms.

Andrey Korshunov, Andrey Golanov, Valery Timirgaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of resection alone in select children with intracranial ependymoma: the Canadian Pediatric Brain Tumour Consortium experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ependymoma in children: molecular considerations and therapeutic insights.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrey KorshunovDepartment of Neuropathology, Neurosurgical NN Burdenko Institute, Moscow, Russia. akorshunov@nsi.ru
Andrey Golanov
Valery Timirgaz
Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial ependymomas are the third most common primary brain tumor in children. Although clinical and histological criteria for ependymoma prognosis are recognized, studies have reported contradictory results. Prognostic significance based on immunohistochemistry of ependymomas has been reported in a few studies. One-hundred and twelve patients with intracranial ependymomas were examined retrospectively for immunoexpression of various tumor-associated antigens and apoptosis. The results demonstrated significant preponderance of expression of the tenascin, vascular endothelial growth factor protein (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGFR) and p53 protein in high-grade tumors. Also high-grade ependymomas revealed more prominent labeling indices (LI) for proliferative marker Ki-S1 and apoptotic index (AI), and lower LI for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27/Kipl and pl4ARF. For low-grade ependymomas the progression-free survival time (PFS) was found to be significantly shorter for Ki-S1 LI > 5%, and for tenascin, VEGF and EGFR positivity. For high-grade ependymomas PFS was found to be significantly reduced for p27 LI < 20%, p14ARF LI < 10%, for p53 positivity, and for AI < 1%. The CART modeling process exhibited five final groups of ependymoma patients (1) low-grade and tenascin-negative; (2) low-grade and tenascin-positive; (3) high-grade and p53-negative with p14 LI > 0%; (4) high-grade with combination of either p53 positivity and p14 LI > 10% or p53 negativity and p14 LI < 10%; (5) high-grade and p53-positive with pl4 LI < 10%. In summary, some immunohistochemical variables were found to be the strong predictors of ependymoma recurrence and they seem to be useful for assessing individual tumor prognosis in routinely processed biopsy specimens together with tumor grade. For histologically benign ependymomas immunohistochemical study should be focused on Ki-S1, tenascin, EGFR and VEGF evaluation, whereas p53 expression and number of p27, p14 and ISEL-positive nuclei will be of value in determining PFS from high-grade ependymomas.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChildEpendymomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMalePrognosisSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID12187959
OpenAlexW86149408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.