ArticleSexually transmitted infections2002
Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexually Transmitted Infections and Behavioral Determinants of Sexual and Reproductive Health in the Allahabad District (India) Based on Data from the ChlamIndia Study.Microorganisms · 2019Article
- A multisite implementation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay to predict ciprofloxacin susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2019Article
- [Modern diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2007Review
- Vulvovaginal-swab or first-catch urine specimen to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women in a community setting?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
- Use of flocked swabs and a universal transport medium to enhance molecular detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
- The superiority of polymerase chain reaction over an amplified enzyme immunoassay for the detection of genital chlamydial infections.Sexually transmitted infections · 2006Article
- Molecular diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome: the state of the art.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2005Review
- Enhanced enzyme immunoassay with negative-gray-zone testing compared to a single nucleic Acid amplification technique for community-based chlamydial screening of men.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2004Review
- Current Issues in Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.Current infectious disease reports · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleic acid amplification (NAA) assays for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections started to appear in the peer reviewed literature about 12 years ago and during that period we have seen an incredible effort put into the development and evaluation of commercially developed NAA kits to diagnose and treat infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.