ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2002
Future prospects for alemtuzumab (MabCampath).
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative strategies in lymphoma therapy.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2003Article
- Alemtuzumab.Drugs · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the treatment of hematological malignancies, the significance of achieving molecular complete remissions rather than a clinical complete remission has become increasingly apparent, as relapse is considered to be related to the presence and extent of residual, persistent malignant cells. Progress in the use of alemtuzumab (MabCampath) to eradicate minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has positive implications for patients, particularly prior to stem cell transplantation. Another beneficial aspect of monoclonal antibody therapy under active investigation is the ability of alemtuzumab to repeatedly produce or maintain responses. Subcutaneous administration of alemtuzumab is now emerging as a key advancement in the treatment of CLL. A phase II trial of subcutaneous alemtuzumab has demonstrated an 87% response rate in 38 previously untreated patients, with a reduction in intravenous administration-related rigors, as well as the elimination of nausea, dyspnea, diarrhea, and hypotension, frequently seen following intravenous administration of alemtuzumab. This trial demonstrates the advantages for safety, cost, flexibility, and convenience offered by subcutaneous administration of alemtuzumab. Finally, encouraging results with the combination of alemtuzumab and fludarabine, which demonstrate eradication of malignant cells in patients who are resistant to either agent alone, open the way for such combinations to produce durable responses even in refractory disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.