Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12180493›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2002

Future prospects for alemtuzumab (MabCampath).

Kanti Rai, Michael Hallek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Innovative strategies in lymphoma therapy.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2003
    Article
  2. Alemtuzumab.Drugs · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kanti RaiLong Island Jewish Medical Center New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA. rai@lij.edu
Michael Hallek
Long Island Jewish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the treatment of hematological malignancies, the significance of achieving molecular complete remissions rather than a clinical complete remission has become increasingly apparent, as relapse is considered to be related to the presence and extent of residual, persistent malignant cells. Progress in the use of alemtuzumab (MabCampath) to eradicate minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has positive implications for patients, particularly prior to stem cell transplantation. Another beneficial aspect of monoclonal antibody therapy under active investigation is the ability of alemtuzumab to repeatedly produce or maintain responses. Subcutaneous administration of alemtuzumab is now emerging as a key advancement in the treatment of CLL. A phase II trial of subcutaneous alemtuzumab has demonstrated an 87% response rate in 38 previously untreated patients, with a reduction in intravenous administration-related rigors, as well as the elimination of nausea, dyspnea, diarrhea, and hypotension, frequently seen following intravenous administration of alemtuzumab. This trial demonstrates the advantages for safety, cost, flexibility, and convenience offered by subcutaneous administration of alemtuzumab. Finally, encouraging results with the combination of alemtuzumab and fludarabine, which demonstrate eradication of malignant cells in patients who are resistant to either agent alone, open the way for such combinations to produce durable responses even in refractory disease.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellNeoplasm, ResidualAlemtuzumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID12180493
OpenAlexW2052900044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.