ArticleNucleic acids research2002
A functional screening assay for the isolation of transcription factors.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dry and wet approaches for genome-wide functional annotation of conventional and unconventional transcriptional activators.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2016Review
- Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: from the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012Review
- Transcriptional activators in yeast.Nucleic acids research · 2006Article
- Screening of retroviral cDNA libraries for factors involved in protein phosphorylation in signaling cascades.Nucleic acids research · 2005Article
- Oligonucleotide-directed site-specific integration of high complexity libraries into ssDNA templates.Nucleic acids research · 2004Article
- A novel functional gene selection method provides a systematic view of cell migration.Cell adhesion & migrationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) have been difficult to identify by bioinformatics, due to the heterogenous nature of the domains they are composed of. Therefore, we have developed a simple and generally applicable screening system for the identification of transcriptional activators, based on the presence of a functional transactivation domain (TAD). The system utilizes a retroviral vector to express a cDNA library as fusion genes with the yeast gal4 DNA-binding domain. This retroviral library is transduced into a murine NIH3T3-based reporter cell line carrying a stable integrated gal4 promoter-green fluorescent protein reporter gene. cDNA inserts encoding a functional TAD reconstitute a chimeric TF that activates the reporter gene. After fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and expansion of GFP-positive cells, the responsible cDNA inserts are retrieved. From a cDNA library of cytokine-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), a number of known as well as potentially novel TFs were isolated, demonstrating the suitability of the system. The identification of other factors that are currently not associated with transcriptional regulation suggest additional functions for these proteins. Moreover, our results have focused attention on signaling pathways that have not been recognized previously in the context of endothelial cell biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.