Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12177295›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2002

Transcription and nuclear transport of CAG/CTG trinucleotide repeats in yeast.

Emmanuelle Fabre, Bernard Dujon, Guy-Franck Richard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A genomic portrait of human microsatellite variation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2011
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2008
    Review
  9. Evolutionary patterns of non-coding RNAs.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emmanuelle FabreUnité de Génétique Moléculaire des Levures (URA 2171 CNRS and UFR 927 Université Pierre et Marie Curie) Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris cedex 15, France. efabre@pasteur.fr
Bernard Dujon
Guy-Franck Richard
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trinucleotide repeats are involved in several neurological disorders in humans. DNA sequences containing CAG/CTG repeats are prone to slippage during replication and double-strand break repair. The effects of trinucleotide repeats on transcription and on nuclear export were analyzed in vivo in yeast. Transcription of a CAG/CTG trinucleotide repeat in the 3'-untranslated region of a URA3 reporter gene leads to transcription of messenger RNAs several kilobases longer than the expected size. These long mRNAs form more readily when CAG rather than CTG repeats are transcribed. CAG- or CUG-containing transcripts show a non-homogeneous cellular localization. We propose that long mRNAs result from transcription slippage, and discuss the possible implications for human diseases.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae3' Untranslated RegionsActive Transport, Cell NucleusBase SequenceBlotting, NorthernGenes, FungalHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOrotidine-5'-Phosphate DecarboxylaseRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionTrinucleotide Repeats3' Untranslated RegionsOrotidine-5'-Phosphate DecarboxylaseRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID12177295
PMCPMC134249
OpenAlexW1972158487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.