Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12177080›Full record

Trial reportJournal of epidemiology and community health2002

Evidence based educational outreach visits: effects on prescriptions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

E Bernal-Delgado, M Galeote-Mayor, F Pradas-Arnal, S Peiró-Moreno

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E Bernal-DelgadoFundación Instituto de Investigación en Servicios de Salud, Zaragoza, Spain. ebernal@comz.org
M Galeote-Mayor
F Pradas-Arnal
S Peiró-Moreno
Instituto Nacional de la Salud · ESUnidad de Investigación en cuidados y servicios de salud (Investén-isciii) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence based group educational outreach visit on prescription patterns of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in primary care.

designRandomised controlled simple blind trial, with randomisation into three groups: experimental (evidence based educational outreach visit), placebo (conventional education session), and control (without intervention).

settingThe 24 primary care centres of the National Institute of Healthcare Network in a rural province of Aragon, Spain.

participantsThe 24 primary health care teams of the network, with 158 general practitioners (GPs). The teams were randomised into the groups, experimental (8 teams, 48 GPs), placebo (8 teams, 54 GPs), and control (8 teams, 56 GPs).

interventionExperimental group: one group educational outreach visit, conveying data based on a systematic review of the literature that was reinforced with printed material; placebo group: one non-structured educational session; control group: no intervention. Both educational sessions emphasised that there are no differences in the effectiveness of the NSAIDs reviewed (diclofenac, piroxicam, and tenoxicam); a recommendation was made to prescribe diclofenac over tenoxicam because of price differences.

main outcome measuresChanges in the number of packages prescribed for each of the drugs and changes in the cost per package of NSAIDs prescribed during the six months before, and after the intervention.

resultsThere were no differences in the basal characteristics of the three groups, except for the number of prescriptions during the six months before the intervention. Prescriptions for NSAIDs decreased homogeneously in the three groups. For tenoxicam, the experimental group reduced prescriptions by 22.5% (95%CI: 34.42 to -10.76), compared with a reduction of 9.78% (95%CI: -17.70 to -1.86) in the placebo group and an increase of 14.44% (95%CI: 5.22 to 23.66) in the control group. The average cost per prescription decreased by 1.91% (95%CI: -0.33% to -3.49%) in the experimental group, 0.16% (95%CI: -0.27% to -2.93%) in the placebo group, and rose by 1.76% (95%CI: 0.35% to 3.17%) in the control group.

conclusionsEvidence based educational outreach visits are more effective than no intervention at all. Results suggest that evidence based educational outreach visits are incrementally more effective than conventional educational sessions, which in turn are more effective than no intervention at all.

Indexed as

Drug UtilizationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDrug CostsDrug PrescriptionsEducation, Medical, ContinuingEvidence-Based MedicineFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareReview Literature as TopicSingle-Blind MethodSpainAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID12177080
PMCPMC1732253
OpenAlexW1994894768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.