Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12171967›Full record

ArticleGut2002

Explaining variation in familial adenomatous polyposis: relationship between genotype and phenotype and evidence for modifier genes.

M D Crabtree, I P M Tomlinson, S V Hodgson, K Neale, R K S Phillips, R S Houlston

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Wild-type APC Influences the Severity of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The genetic basis of colonic adenomatous polyposis syndromes.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic dissection of the Mom5 modifier locus and evaluation of Mom5 candidate genes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. APC and its modifiers in colon cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2009
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M D CrabtreeMolecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK. m.crabtree@icrf.icnet.uk
I P M Tomlinson
S V Hodgson
K Neale
R K S Phillips
R S Houlston
St Mark's Hospital · GBThe Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is characterised by variable phenotypic expression. Part of this is attributable to a relationship between APC genotype and phenotype but there remains significant intrafamilial variation. In the Min mouse model of FAP, differences in the severity of gastrointestinal polyposis result from the action of modifier genes.

aimsTo determine whether phenotypic variation in human FAP has an inherited component consistent with the action of modifier genes.

methodWe systematically examined polyp numbers in colectomy specimens from patients with classical FAP. Variation both between and within families was analysed. Formal modelling of the segregation of disease severity in families was performed

resultsThere was strong evidence for a relationship between site of mutation and the number of colorectal polyps, with germline mutations in the "cluster region" causing the most severe disease and those with mutations between codons 1020 and 1169 having the mildest disease. In addition to this genotype-phenotype relationship, we found evidence for non-APC linked genetic modifiers of disease expression. First degree relatives had more similar polyp counts than more distant relatives. Formal modelling of the segregation of disease severity in families revealed further evidence for the action of modifier genes, with a best fit to a mixed model of inheritance.

conclusionOur data provide good evidence to support the hypothesis that modifier genes influence the severity of FAP in humans.

Indexed as

Genes, APCAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdolescentAdultColonic PolypsFemaleGenotypeGerm-Line MutationHumansMalePedigreePhenotypeSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID12171967
PMCPMC1773342
OpenAlexW2161884297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.