Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12171223›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2002

Applying community-oriented primary care methods in British general practice: a case study.

Steve Iliffe, Penny Lenihan, Paul Wallace, Vari Drennan, Martin Blanchard, Andrew Harris

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrating public health and primary care.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2007
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clients or citizens? Some considerations for primary care organisations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steve IliffeDepartment of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and UCL Medical School, London. s.iliffe@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Penny Lenihan
Paul Wallace
Vari Drennan
Martin Blanchard
Andrew Harris
The Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe '75 and over' assessments built into the 1990 contract for general practice have failed to enthuse primary care teams or make a significant impact on the health of older people. Alternative methods for improving the health of older people living at home are being sought.

aimTo test the feasibility of applying community-oriented primary care methodology to a relatively deprived sub-population of older people in a relatively deprived area. DESIGN OF STUDY: A combination of developmental and triangulation approaches to data analysis.

settingFour general practices in an inner London borough.

methodA community-oriented primary care approach was used to initiate innovative care for older people, supported financially by the health authority and practically by primary care academics.

resultsAll four practices identified problems needing attention in the older population, developed different projects focused on particular needs among older people, and tested them in practice. Patient and public involvement were central to the design and implementation processes in only one practice. Innovations were sustained in only one practice, but some were adopted by a primary care group and others extended to a wider group of practices by the health authority.

conclusionA modified community-oriented primary care approach can be used in British general practice, and changes can be promoted that are perceived as valuable by planning bodies. However, this methodology may have more impact at primary care trust level than at practice level.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentAgedCommunity Health PlanningCommunity Health ServicesFamily PracticeHealth Services for the AgedHumansOrganizational Case StudiesOrganizational InnovationPrimary Health CareState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID12171223
PMCPMC1314383
OpenAlexW2144712354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.