Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12171069›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes2002

EPR characterization of ubisemiquinones and iron-sulfur cluster N2, central components of the energy coupling in the NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) in situ.

Sergey Magnitsky, Larisa Toulokhonova, Takahiro Yano, Vladimir D Sled, Cecilia Hägerhäll, Vera G Grivennikova, Doshimjan S Burbaev, Andrei D Vinogradov, Tomoko Ohnishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Understanding coenzyme Q.Physiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Roles of semiquinone species in proton pumping mechanism by complex I.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A model of the proton translocation mechanism of complex I.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergey MagnitskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Medical School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6059, USA.
Larisa Toulokhonova
Takahiro Yano
Vladimir D Sled
Cecilia Hägerhäll
Vera G Grivennikova
Doshimjan S Burbaev
Andrei D Vinogradov
Tomoko Ohnishi
University of Pennsylvania · USLomonosov Moscow State University · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

PROTON &ELECTRON TRANSFER &ENERGY COUPLING IN SIT IR01GM030736 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI OHNISHI, TOMOKO NONE · 1985 to 2010
$3.1M
MOLECULAR &CONTROL MECHANISM OF ENERGY COUPLING SITE IR03TW000140 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI OHNISHI, TOMOKO NONE · 1993 to 1998
–
FIC NIH HHS R03TW00140-01A2NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM30736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proton-translocating NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) is the largest and least understood respiratory complex. The intrinsic redox components (FMN and iron-sulfur clusters) reside in the promontory part of the complex. Ubiquinone is the most possible key player in proton-pumping reactions in the membrane part. Here we report the presence of three distinct semiquinone species in complex I in situ, showing widely different spin relaxation profiles. As our first approach, the semiquinone forms were trapped during the steady state NADH-ubiquinone-1 (Q1) reactions in the tightly coupled, activated bovine heart submitochondrial particles, and were named SQNf (fast-relaxing component), SQNS (slow-relaxing), and SQNx (very slow relaxing). This indicates the presence of at least three different quinone-binding sites in complex I. In the current study, special attention was placed on the SQNf, because of its high sensitivities to DeltamicroH+ and to specific complex I inhibitors (rotenone and piericidin A) in a unique manner. Rotenone inhibits the forward electron transfer reaction more strongly than the reverse reaction, while piericidine A inhibits both reactions with a similar potency. Rotenone quenched the SQNf signal at a much lower concentration than that required to quench the slower relaxing components (SQNs and SQNx). A close correlation was shown between the line shape alteration of the g// = 2.05 signal of the cluster N2 and the quenching of the SQNf signal, using two different experimental approaches: (1) changing the DeltamicroH+ poise by the oligomycin titration which decreases proton leak across the SMP membrane; (2) inhibiting the reverse electron transfer with different concentrations of rotenone. These new experimental results further strengthen our earlier proposal that a direct spin-coupling occurs between SQNf and cluster N2. We discuss the implications of these findings in connection with the energy coupling mechanism in complex .

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyAnimalsBinding SitesCattleCoenzymesElectron TransportElectron Transport Complex IIron-Sulfur ProteinsMitochondria, HeartNADH, NADPH OxidoreductasesUbiquinoneUncoupling Agentscoenzyme Q10CoenzymesElectron Transport Complex IIron-Sulfur ProteinsNADH, NADPH OxidoreductasesUbiquinoneUncoupling Agents

Identifiers

PMID12171069
OpenAlexW1851154662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.