ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2002
Multiplex loss of heterozygosity analysis by using single or very few cells.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential responses of Citrus species to Huanglongbing infection for physiological, biochemical, nutritional, bio-stress enzymes, and molecular markers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Low copy number DNA template can render polymerase chain reaction error prone in a sequence-dependent manner.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2005Article
- Direct detection of insertion/deletion polymorphisms in an autosomal region by analyzing high-density markers in individual spermatozoa.American journal of human genetics · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is an indication of tumor suppressor gene inactivation. However, loss of heterozygosity analysis has been limited to either a small scale or to very few genetic markers. To significantly increase the scale of study and to include a large number of markers in the analysis, experimental conditions were established for using single cells or single cell equivalent with 10 markers typed simultaneously. Under these conditions, the allele amplification failure rate was 3.7% when single tissue cultured human cells were used. When 30 cells from a 5- micro m paraffin-archived breast tumor tissue section were used, the failure rates were 0% for four of the five heterozygous loci and 10% for the fifth. Small amplification failure rates (6.1% and 6.7% on average) were observed when 5 or 10 cells from paraffin-archived breast tissue were used. These results indicate that with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers of high quality, it is possible to obtain reliable results by using single cells from fresh tissue or very few cells from paraffin-archived specimens. The results also show the importance of including replicates, using primers of high quality, and optimizing PCR conditions when a limited amount of material is used for the assay. The feasibility of LOH analysis with very few paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues was demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.