ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2002
Loss of heterozygosity studies revisited: prior quantification of the amplifiable DNA content of archival samples improves efficiency and reliability.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential responses of Citrus species to Huanglongbing infection for physiological, biochemical, nutritional, bio-stress enzymes, and molecular markers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biobanking in genomic medicine.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2015Review
- Molecular Heterogeneity in Primary Breast Carcinomas and Axillary Lymph Node Metastases Assessed by Genomic Fingerprinting Analysis.Cancer growth and metastasis · 2015Article
- Microarray-based DNA methylation study of Ewing's sarcoma of the bone.Oncology letters · 2014Article
- High-efficiency genotype analysis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2011Article
- Sensitive and specific KRAS somatic mutation analysis on whole-genome amplified DNA from archival tissues.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2010Article
- Somatic deletion of the NF1 gene in a neurofibromatosis type 1-associated malignant melanoma demonstrated by digital PCR.Molecular cancer · 2006Article
- A novel multiplexing, polymerase chain reaction-based assay for the analysis of chromosome 18q status in colorectal cancer.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2005Article
- Low copy number DNA template can render polymerase chain reaction error prone in a sequence-dependent manner.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies of archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues have become an important tool in the search for tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes and are also used increasingly in clinical practice. However, FFPE tissue samples may contain little amplifiable DNA, resulting in frequent reaction failures and unreliable LOH data. Using pairs of serial dilutions of reference DNA, we determined the minimum amplifiable DNA concentration necessary for reliable microsatellite-PCR LOH analysis. We then measured the amplifiable DNA content of a selection of frozen and FFPE-derived tumor specimens by real-time quantitative PCR. A minimum input of 600 pg of 100% amplifiable DNA per PCR was required for reliable LOH analysis. While the total DNA concentrations of all samples exceeded this figure, most FFPE-sample-derived DNA was non-amplifiable, with ratios of actually amplifiable DNA to total DNA as low as 1 to 3625. Many FFPE samples therefore contained substantially less than 600 pg/microl of actually amplifiable DNA, making them potentially unsuitable for LOH studies. Real-time quantitative PCR before LOH studies of FFPE tissues allows: identification of samples, which will fail microsatellite-PCR; exclusion of samples, which will yield unreliable results; and optimal adjustment of template input for the remainder. Amplification reactions undertaken without this precaution can result in unreliable LOH data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.