Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12169228›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2002

Myotonic dystrophy: clinical and molecular parallels between myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2.

Laura P W Ranum, John W Day

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Myotonic dystrophy type 2: the 2020 update.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Benign tumors in myotonic dystrophy type I target disease-related cancer sites.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Recent advances in myotonic dystrophy type 2.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura P W RanumInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Minnesota, MMC 206, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. ranum001@umn.edu
John W Day
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a dominantly inherited disorder with a peculiar pattern of multisystemic clinical features affecting skeletal muscle, the heart, the eye, and the endocrine system. Two genetic loci have been associated with the DM phenotype: DM1 on chromosome 19, and DM2 on chromosome 3. In 1992, the mutation responsible for DM1 was identified as a CTG expansion located in the 3' untranslated region of the dystrophica myotonica-protein kinase gene (DMPK). How this untranslated CTG expansion causes DM1 has been a matter of controversy. The recent discovery that DM2 is caused by an untranslated CCTG expansion, along with other discoveries on DM1 pathogenesis, indicate that the clinical features common to both diseases are caused by a gain of function RNA mechanism in which the CUG and CCUG repeats alter cellular function, including alternative splicing of various genes.

Indexed as

AnimalsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMutationMyotonic DisordersMyotonic DystrophyMyotonin-Protein KinaseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA-Binding ProteinsTrinucleotide Repeat ExpansionCNBP protein, humanDMPK protein, humanHomeodomain ProteinsMyotonin-Protein KinaseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA-Binding ProteinsSIX5 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID12169228
OpenAlexW2056911242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.