ArticleEndocrine pathology2002
Thyroid gland: international case conference.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023Review
- Different Threshold of Malignancy forCancers · 2022Article
- Asian and Western practice in thyroid pathology: similarities and differences.Gland surgery · 2020Article
- Histopathologic Assessment of Capsular Invasion in Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms-an Observer Variation Study.Endocrine pathology · 2020Article
- How to handle borderline/precursor thyroid tumors in management of patients with thyroid nodules.Gland surgery · 2018Review
- Deregulation of microRNA expression in thyroid neoplasias.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2014Review
- Article
- A score based on microscopic criteria proposed for analysis of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2008Article
- Difficult cases of thyroid pathology.Endocrine pathology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cases of five thyroid tumors were presented and discussed at an international case conference held during the 5th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Endocrine Pathology Society. There was significant disagreement among six pathologists who studied the cases. In this article, we present two of the cases, attempt to explain the reason for disagreement in their diagnoses, and propose what should be done to obtain better consensus in diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12165661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.