ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2002
Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and atherosclerosis.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Gender disparity in LDL-induced cardiovascular damage and the protective role of estrogens against electronegative LDL.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2014Article
- 17-β Oestradiol prevents cardiovascular dysfunction in post-menopausal metabolic syndrome by affecting SIRT1/AMPK/H3 acetylation.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Article
- Diabetic cardiomyopathy: do women differ from men?Endocrine · 2004Review
- Peritoneal carcinoma in women with genetic susceptibility: implications for Jewish populations.Familial cancer · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The role of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has evolved since estrogen was first proposed to be vasoprotective. The discovery of novel molecular signaling pathways involving the estrogen receptor in vascular cells and the elucidation of numerous biologic mechanisms have suggested that HRT may exert its potentially beneficial or adverse cardiovascular effects through multiple mechanisms. Estrogen has genomic, as well as rapid nongenomic, effects that alter vasodilation, coagulation, inflammation, and the vascular injury response, some of which may have potentially beneficial or adverse cardiovascular consequences. Current guidelines do not support the use of HRT in the secondary prevention of CVD, and recent results of primary prevention trials show evidence of increased early cardiovascular risk and no overall health benefit with combination estrogen-progestin treatment. The role of estrogen alone in the primary prevention of CVD awaits the results of ongoing trials. The key to the use of estrogen replacement therapy for the prevention of CVD may be to target therapy before atherosclerosis is evident, and to identify women with genetic susceptibility who may be at increased risk for an adverse outcome associated with therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.