ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2002
Specialized lipid profiles.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with abnormal blood lipids and lipoproteins are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease. With the development of effective dietary, behavioral, and pharmaceutical treatments to optimize blood lipoproteins, accurate clinical assessment of blood lipids and lipoproteins are essential for patient management and research. This article discusses the use of a variety of lipid analyses currently available. The use of traditional lipoprotein measurements, including Friedewald calculation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and ultracentrifugation methods to measure blood lipoproteins, are discussed. Newer analytic techniques, including the vertical analytic profile, nuclear magnetic resonance, direct LDL measurement, LDL size determination, and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants, are also described. Despite the development of a number of lipid and lipoprotein assays, lipoprotein analysis with a Friedewald- calculated LDL measurement remains the lipoprotein analysis performed in approximately 93% of clinical laboratories. It remains to be determined if the alternative lipid and lipoprotein assays currently available will become more widely utilized in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.