ReviewCurrent oncology reports2002
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparison of clinical outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation between patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral (post-thymic) T-cell lymphoma consists of a wide spectrum of disorders with marked differences in biology and behavior. Proper classification is pivotal for evaluating treatment results, and most studies performed a decade ago lump together different disease entities and cannot be interpreted. With improved use of immunophenotyping and molecular methods for these disorders, their exact nature is better defined in the Revised European-American Lymphoma and subsequent World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. The WHO classification of post- thymic T/natural killer (NK)-cell lymphoma consists of 15 entities, including about 30% that are unclassified cases. A wide range in incidence exists between different populations, but it is likely to be lower than previously estimated. Certain entities, like nasal/nasal-type T/NK-cell lymphoma and human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus 1, are much more prevalent in certain racial groups and show exquisite viral association. In these entities as a group, prognosis and treatment seem inferior to those of their B-cell counterparts, but treatment must be tailored to the exact pathologic diagnosis and prognostic index. Aggressive combination chemotherapy appears to be curative for certain entities (eg, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive), whereas purine analogues may be useful for low-grade entities. The role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation is still poorly defined. Specific antibody-based therapy is also on the horizon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.