Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12162104›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2002

Use of modulators of airways inflammation in patients with CF.

Clement L Ren

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clement L RenDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology & Allergy, University of Rochester, Box 667, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the hallmarks of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease is the presence of intense, neutrophil-dominated airway inflammation, and many researchers have focused on developing therapies to reduce inflammation in CF lung disease. Systemic corticosteroids can delay progression of lung disease, but at the cost of unacceptable side effects. Inhaled corticosteroids are widely used, but their efficacy has yet to be demonstrated in a controlled fashion. Ibuprofen has also been shown to delay disease progression, but its use has been limited by the need to obtain individual pharmacokinetics and concern about side effects. Other treatments with potential anti-inflammatory effects include pentoxifylline, leukotriene antagonists, docosahexaenoic acid, and azithromycin. Few, if any, large clinical studies of these therapies have been published, but several are presently underway. Because neutrophil elastase appears to be a key mediator of tissue damage in CF lung disease, anti-elastase compounds have also been studied, including alpha-1-protease inhibitor, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, and small molecule inhibitors. There have been no large-scale controlled trials of these therapies in CF. More recently, investigators have focused on cytokine modulation, using either interleukin-10 or interferon gamma. Some complementary and alternative medicine therapies may also have anti-inflammatory effects, although their clinical value has yet to be demonstrated in a rigorously-controlled fashion. In summary, numerous anti-inflammatory therapies have been applied to CF lung disease, but more large, well-controlled studies will need to be performed to determine their true clinical usefulness.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnti-Inflammatory AgentsComplementary TherapiesCystic FibrosisHumansInflammationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnti-Inflammatory Agents

Identifiers

PMID12162104
OpenAlexW2005599518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.