ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
Facilitating changes in perinatal smoking. The impact of a stage-based workshop for care-providers in British Columbia.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Stopping smoking during pregnancy: are we on the right track?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publiqueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the impact of stage-based smoking cessation workshops for perinatal care-providers.
methodsA one-day workshop was designed and piloted with perinatal care-providers in Comox Valley, British Columbia. Dissemination to eight other communities followed. Pre- and post-questionnaires were collected from 270 care-providers. Clients (n = 115) were interviewed after contact with a care-provider.
resultsWorkshops increased care-provider knowledge (p < 0.0001), confidence to address smoking with clients (p < 0.0001), and perceived ability to help clients across the stages of change (p < 0.0001). There was an increase in use of the model (p < 0.0001) by care-providers, with 86% reporting changing their work with perinatal clients and 75% applying it beyond that setting. A significant shift in client readiness to change occurred during the pilot (p = 0.001) and dissemination (p = 0.013). Eighty percent of dissemination clients reported altering smoking behaviours as a result of intervention and 36% made at least one attempt to quit. Client satisfaction was high. Spin-off benefits included increased community collaboration, and capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
12154532PMC6980019W1603749059What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.