ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002
Process and impact of mergers of NHS trusts: multicentre case study and management cost analysis.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of hospital mergers: a systematic review focusing on healthcare quality measures.European journal of public health · 2022Pooled it
- The bigger, the better? A systematic review on the impact of mergers on primary care organizations.European journal of public health · 2021Pooled it
- The impact of new forms of large-scale general practice provider collaborations on England's NHS: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Pooled it
- Hospital acquisitions and 30-day mortality after acute myocardial infarction and stroke in Germany: a quasi-experimental cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Cross-sector collaboration to reduce health inequalities: a qualitative study of local collaboration between health care, social services, and other sectors under health system reforms in England.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The influence of the merger process between two tertiary hospitals in Romania on job satisfaction among staff.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- England's new health and care bill.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- When trust, confidence, and faith collide: refining a realist theory of how and why inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work.BMC health services research · 2021Review
- Administration of Strategic Agreements in Public Hospitals: Considerations to Enhance the Quality and Sustainability of Mergers and Acquisitions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review.Systematic reviews · 2021Review
- Job Satisfaction Among Employees After a Merger: A Cross-Sectional Survey in the Local Health Unit of Sardinia Region, Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- The problems of smaller, rural and remote hospitals: Separating facts from fiction.Future healthcare journal · 2020Article
- Multiple Perspectives Analysis of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Model for Older Adults in Quebec.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
- Ready for the Triple Aim? Perspectives on organizational readiness for implementing change from a Danish obstetrics and gynecology department.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- More care out of hospital? A qualitative exploration of the factors influencing the development of the district nursing workforce in England.Journal of health services research & policy · 2019Article
- Concentration of health care providers: does it contribute to integration of service delivery?Risk management and healthcare policy · 2019Article
- Changing how we think about healthcare improvement.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Article
- Reorganising health and social care in Québec: a journey towards integrating care through mergers.London journal of primary care · 2018Article
- Making the most of natural experiments: What can studies of the withdrawal of public health interventions offer?Preventive medicine · 2018Review
- Money's (not) on my mind: a qualitative study of how staff and managers understand health care's triple Aim.BMC health services research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the processes involved in and impact of mergers between NHS trusts, including the effect on management costs.
designCross sectional study involving in depth interviews and documentary analysis; case study to compare savings in management costs between case trusts and control trusts.
settingNine trusts (cross sectional study) and four trusts (case study) in London.
participants96 interviews with trust board members, other senior managers, clinicians, service managers, and representatives of health authorities, regional office, community health councils, local authorities, other trusts in the area, and primary care groups and trusts.
main outcome measuresStated and unstated drivers, and impact of merger on delivery and development of services, management structures, and staff recruitment, retention, and morale. Effects of difference in trust size before and after the merger. Savings in management costs two years after merger.
resultsSome important drivers for merger are not publicly stated. Mergers had a negative effect on delivery of services because of a loss of managerial focus on services. Planned developments in services were delayed by at least 18 months. Trusts' larger sizes after mergers had unintended negative consequences, as well as predicted advantages. The tendency for one trust's management team to dominate over the other resulted in tension. No improvement in recruitment or retention of clinical and managerial staff was reported. Perceived differences in organisational culture were an important barrier to bringing together two or more organisations. Two years after merger, merged trusts had not achieved the objective of saving pound 500 000 a year in management costs.
conclusionsImportant unintended consequences need to be accounted for when mergers are planned. Mergers can cause considerable disruptions to services, and require greater management support than previously acknowledged. Other organisations undergoing restructuring, such as primary care groups developing into primary care trusts and health authorities merging into strategic health authorities, should take these findings into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.