Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12153334›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2002

Nefazodone in the treatment of elderly patients with depressive disorders: a prospective, observational study.

Jerónimo Saiz-Ruiz, Angela Ibañez, Marina Díaz-Marsá, Francisco Arias, José L Carrasco, David Huertas, Manuel Martín-Carrasco, Isabel Moreno, Fernando Rico-Villademoros

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jerónimo Saiz-RuizDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. jsaiz@hrc.insalud.es
Angela Ibañez
Marina Díaz-Marsá
Francisco Arias
José L Carrasco
David Huertas
Manuel Martín-Carrasco
Isabel Moreno
Fernando Rico-Villademoros
Universidad de Alcalá · ESInstituto Cajal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and tolerability of nefazodone for the treatment of depression in elderly patients in clinical routine practice. PATIENTS AND STUDY

designSeventy-nine patients with a mean age of 72.81 years, who had major depression or dysthymia according to DSM-IV criteria, were enrolled into this open label study. Patients were prescribed nefazodone starting at 50 mg/day, increasing every 4 days until a dosage of 200 mg/day was attained, and subsequently upward to 600 mg/day if no dose-limiting adverse effects appeared. Effectiveness was evaluated at the end of weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 by completion of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale. The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), the sleep satisfaction item of the Oviedo Sleep Questionnaire (OSQ) and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) were used to assess the patients at the end of week 12. Primary efficacy analysis was based on an intention-to-treat, last-observation-carried-forward data set.

resultsHAM-D scores decreased progressively from a baseline mean of 22.3 to 14.2 at the study endpoint; although this was a significant reduction, the endpoint score indicates that a significant residual symptomatology remained in the patients. Similarly, the GDS and HAM-A scores had decreased significantly by week 12. Response and remission rates were 47 and 37.5%, respectively. The percentage of patients who were satisfied, much satisfied or very much satisfied with their sleep according to the OSQ increased from 4.2% at baseline up to 62.2% at the study endpoint. A significant reduction in the SPMSQ total score was observed at the study endpoint, although the clinical relevance of this finding is doubtful. Forty-two (53.2%) patients completed the study. The most common reasons for withdrawal from the study were a lack of efficacy and adverse effects. Most adverse reactions were mild to moderate in severity and included dizziness, dry mouth, gastrointestinal distress, sedation, anxiety and malaise.

conclusionOur results suggest that nefazodone may be a well tolerated and effective alternative for treating elderly patients with depression. Although the HAM-D score at study endpoint indicated significant residual symptomatology, a similar finding has been described in several meta-analyses of antidepressant treatment in the elderly. Further research is needed to evaluate a different nefazodone dose regimen, especially a slower dose titration rate, which could result in a reduced discontinuation rate and thus a better treatment outcome.

Indexed as

AgedAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMalePiperazinesProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeTriazolesAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationnefazodonePiperazinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID12153334
OpenAlexW1999617654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.