Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12153331›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2002

Potential new methods for antiepileptic drug delivery.

Robert S Fisher, Jet Ho

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. MFCC-CNN: A patient-independent seizure prediction model.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neonatal pharmacology: extensive interindividual variability despite limited size.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery.Experimental and molecular pathology · 2009
    Review
  16. Nanotechnology for delivery of drugs to the brain for epilepsy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2009
    Review
  17. Intraventricular and intracerebral delivery of anti-epileptic drugs in the kindling model.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2009
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Colloidal microgels in drug delivery applications.Current pharmaceutical design · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert S FisherStanford Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305-5235, USA. rfisher@stanford.edu
Jet Ho
Stanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of novel drug delivery methods could enhance the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Slow-release oral forms of medication or depot drugs such as skin patches might improve compliance and therefore seizure control. In emergency situations, administration via rectal, nasal or buccal mucosa can deliver the drug more quickly than can oral administration. Slow-release oral forms and rectal forms of AEDs are already approved for use, nasal and buccal administration is currently off-label and skin patches for AEDs are an attractive but currently hypothetical option. Therapies under development may result in the delivery of AEDs directly to the regions of the brain involved in seizures. Experimental protocols are underway to allow continuous infusion of potent excitatory amino acid antagonists into the CSF. In experiments with animal models of epilepsy, AEDs have been delivered successfully to seizure foci in the brain by programmed infusion pumps, acting in response to computerised EEG seizure detection. Inactive prodrugs can be given systemically and activated at the site of the seizure focus by locally released compounds. One such drug under development is DP-VPA (or DP16), which is cleaved to valproic acid (sodium valproate) by phospholipases at the seizure focus. Liposomes and nanoparticles are engineered micro-reservoirs of a drug, with attached antibodies or receptor-specific binding agents designed to target the particles to a specific region of the body. Liposomes in theory could deliver a high concentration of an AED to a seizure focus. Penetration of the blood-brain barrier can be accomplished by linking large particles to iron transferrin or biological toxins that can cross the barrier. In the near future, it is likely that cell transplants that generate neurotransmitters and neuromodulators will accomplish renewable endogenous drug delivery. However, the survival and viability of transplanted cells have yet to be demonstrated in the clinical setting. Gene therapy also may play a role in local drug delivery with the use of adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpesvirus or other delivery vectors to induce brain cells to produce local modulatory substances. New delivery systems should significantly improve the therapeutic/toxic ratio of AEDs.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsAnticonvulsantsBlood-Brain BarrierChemistry, PharmaceuticalDosage FormsDrug Administration RoutesDrug CarriersEpilepsyGenetic TherapyHumansNeuronsAnticonvulsantsDosage FormsDrug Carriers

Identifiers

PMID12153331
OpenAlexW2057741590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.