Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12147924›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)

A chronotherapeutic approach to effective blood pressure management.

Peter A Meredith

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter A MeredithDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, GL 116NT United Kingdom. p.a.meredith@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Western Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major randomized trials in hypertension have unequivocally demonstrated the benefits of treatment. None of these trials have sought to address the issue of the potential superiority of 24-hour blood pressure control. However, there is a volume of epidemiologic evidence to suggest that prevention of target organ damage requires the sustained reduction of blood pressure throughout the full 24-hour period between doses. Historically, some antihypertensive drugs have been approved for use at high doses to achieve apparent blood pressure control at the end of the once-daily dosing interval. This approach is flawed; attention is focused on this single time point at the end of the dosing interval, without due regard to the antihypertensive response during the rest of the dosing interval. Subsequently, guidelines formulated by the US Food and Drug Administration suggest that all antihypertensive drugs should consistently achieve a trough:peak ratio decline in blood pressure of at least 50%. Evidence suggests that antihypertensive drugs, such as calcium antagonists and angiotensin II receptor blockers, differ in their ability to provide 24-hour blood pressure control. For example, unlike some other angiotensin II receptor blockers, telmisartan provides consistent reduction of blood pressure during the 24-hour period.

Indexed as

ChronotherapyAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmDisease ManagementHumansHypertensionReceptors, AngiotensinAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsReceptors, Angiotensin

Identifiers

PMID12147924
PMCPMC8101822
OpenAlexW2002636695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.