Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12147647›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2002

Angiogenesis, thrombospondin, and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

A Rice, C M Quinn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CT Role in the Assessment of Existence of Breast Cancerous Cells.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessing Absorption Coefficient of Hemoglobin in the Breast Phantom Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Iranian journal of radiology : a quarterly journal published by the Iranian Radiological Society · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Is DCIS breast cancer, and how do I treat it?Current treatment options in oncology · 2013
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Angiogenesis in the progression of breast ductal proliferations.International journal of surgical pathology · 2011
    Article
  20. PDGF-D improves drug delivery and efficacy via vascular normalization, but promotes lymphatic metastasis by activating CXCR4 in breast cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A RiceRoyal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK. ricealex@hotmail.com
C M Quinn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis, the growth of new vessels from existing vasculature, plays an essential role in tumour development. The process involves interaction between a variety of cells, growth factors, and components of the extracellular matrix, regulated by pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors. This review profiles these factors, outlines the available methods for measuring new vessel formation, and discusses the importance of angiogenesis in breast cancer, with emphasis on ductal carcinoma in situ.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeovascularization, PathologicThrombospondinsAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsThrombospondins

Identifiers

PMID12147647
PMCPMC1769713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.