Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12142430›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2002

Genome sequence of Yersinia pestis KIM.

Wen Deng, Valerie Burland, Guy Plunkett, Adam Boutin, George F Mayhew, Paul Liss, Nicole T Perna, Debra J Rose, Bob Mau, Shiguo Zhou and 11 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A frameshift ineLife · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. First Record of the Rare SpeciesPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Yersinia pestis antibiotic resistance: a systematic review.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Wen DengLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Valerie Burland
Guy Plunkett
Adam Boutin
George F Mayhew
Paul Liss
Nicole T Perna
Debra J Rose
Bob Mau
Shiguo Zhou
David C Schwartz
Jaqueline D Fetherston
Luther E Lindler
Robert R Brubaker
Gregory V Plano
Susan C Straley
Kathleen A McDonough
Matthew L Nilles
Jyl S Matson
Frederick R Blattner
Robert D Perry

Funding

BACTERIAL PATHOGEN GENOME INITIATIVEU01AI044387 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI BLATTNER, FREDERICK R · 2000 to 2001
$4.4M
Protein Interactions in Type III Secretion in Y. pestisR01AI051520 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI NILLES, MATTHEW L. · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
BACTERIAL PATHOGEN GENOME INITIATIVER01AI044387 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI BLATTNER, FREDERICK R · 1998 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI44387NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the complete genome sequence of Yersinia pestis KIM, the etiologic agent of bubonic and pneumonic plague. The strain KIM, biovar Mediaevalis, is associated with the second pandemic, including the Black Death. The 4.6-Mb genome encodes 4,198 open reading frames (ORFs). The origin, terminus, and most genes encoding DNA replication proteins are similar to those of Escherichia coli K-12. The KIM genome sequence was compared with that of Y. pestis CO92, biovar Orientalis, revealing homologous sequences but a remarkable amount of genome rearrangement for strains so closely related. The differences appear to result from multiple inversions of genome segments at insertion sequences, in a manner consistent with present knowledge of replication and recombination. There are few differences attributable to horizontal transfer. The KIM and E. coli K-12 genome proteins were also compared, exposing surprising amounts of locally colinear "backbone," or synteny, that is not discernible at the nucleotide level. Nearly 54% of KIM ORFs are significantly similar to K-12 proteins, with conserved housekeeping functions. However, a number of E. coli pathways and transport systems and at least one global regulator were not found, reflecting differences in lifestyle between them. In KIM-specific islands, new genes encode candidate pathogenicity proteins, including iron transport systems, putative adhesins, toxins, and fimbriae.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialBacteriophagesBiological TransportBodily SecretionsChemotaxisDNA ReplicationDNA Transposable ElementsEnergy MetabolismEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, rRNAOperonPlasmidsProtein BiosynthesisRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidVirulenceDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID12142430
PMCPMC135232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.