ArticlePharmacoEconomics2002
Direct medical cost of managing deep vein thrombosis according to the occurrence of complications.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians.Annals of family medicineGuideline
- Converting IMPROVE bleeding and VTE risk assessment models into a fast-and-frugal decision tree for optimal hospital VTE prophylaxis.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluation and management of thromboprophylaxis in Moroccan hospitals at national level: the Avail-MoNa study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2018Article
- Reversible covalent direct thrombin inhibitors.PloS one · 2018Article
- The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.Thrombosis research · 2016Review
- Review of the cost of venous thromboembolism.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2015Review
- Cost and occurrence of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following major orthopaedic surgeries.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2008Article
- Strategies for the management of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.PharmacoEconomics · 2007Article
- The economic burden of supportive care of cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2004Article
- Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.PharmacoEconomics · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has evolved from hospitalisation for intravenous heparin therapy to treatment options that include acute management as an outpatient. While efficacy and safety remain the principal basis for choosing a therapy, the economic consequences of that choice should be considered as well.
objectiveTo estimate the average cost of various DVT management options from the perspective of US health payers.
designInpatient and outpatient management strategies were examined. Inpatient cases were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Edition, Clinical Modification codes and were classified into subgroups according to complication status. A cost estimate was developed by applying unit costs to the corresponding course of treatment. Cost estimates included initial acute care and that occurring in the following 6 months. Resource use profiles and unit costs were derived from several statewide inpatient, emergency room and ambulatory care databases supplemented by national fee schedules, published reports and peer-reviewed literature. All costs are reported in 1999 US dollars.
resultsThe mean 6-month treatment costs for inpatient management ranged from US dollars 3906 to US dollars 17,168, depending on complication status. For outpatient management, the cost ranged from US dollars 2394 to US dollars 3369, depending on frequency of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) injection and need for professional assistance.
conclusionsThe management strategy selected for DVT has an important economic impact. Self-administered LMWH in a homecare setting results in the lowest cost. However, as some patients either cannot, or will not, be treated this way, it is important for decision makers to consider the costs of other strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.