ReviewPharmacoEconomics2002
Reference-based pricing schemes: effect on pharmaceutical expenditure, resource utilisation and health outcomes.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmaceutical policies: effects of reference pricing, other pricing, and purchasing policies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- A structured approach for identifying disease analogs for pulmonary arterial hypertension.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Managing Pharmaceutical Costs in Health Systems: A Review of Affordability, Accessibility and Sustainability Strategies.Journal of market access & health policy · 2024Review
- Impact of a commercial accountable care organization on prescription drugs.Health services research · 2021Article
- How Well Does a Sequential Minimal Optimization Model Perform in Predicting Medicine Prices for Procurement System?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of pharmacy professionals on generic medicines in Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2020Article
- A conceptual framework for investigating the impacts of international trade and investment agreements on noncommunicable disease risk factors.Health policy and planning · 2018Review
- The relevance of systematic reviews on pharmaceutical policy to low- and middle-income countries.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015Review
- Effects of reference pricing in pharmaceutical markets: a review.PharmacoEconomics · 2011Review
- Assessing the impact of global price interdependencies.PharmacoEconomics · 2008Article
- Lessons for a national pharmaceuticals strategy in Canada from Australia and New Zealand.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2007Article
- Reshaping Australian drug policy: the dilemmas of generic medicines policy.Australia and New Zealand health policy · 2007Article
- Challenges for Australia's Bio/Nanopharma Policies: trade deals, public goods and reference pricing in sustainable industrial renewal.Australia and New Zealand health policy · 2007Article
- Reference drug programs: effectiveness and policy implications.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2007Article
- Antidepressant utilization in primary care in a Spanish region: impact of generic and reference-based pricing policy (2000-2004).Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2007Article
- Rethinking prescribing in the United States.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical expenditure is rising more rapidly than the general inflation rate in most advanced countries. One strategy that has been introduced to control pharmaceutical costs is reference-based pricing (RBP). Its potential is restricted to those specific segments of the drug market where several drugs (and/or their generic forms) exist without substantial evidence that any particular agent is superior. Three broad approaches have been adopted. These involve the aggregation of drugs into generic groups, related drug groups (e.g. ACE inhibitors) or drugs grouped by therapeutic indication (e.g. antihypertensives). For each drug group, a single reimbursement level or reference price is set. Drugs above the reference price require part or total payment by the patient. The experience with RBP ranges from over 10 years in Germany (involving all levels of RBP) to the more recent implementation of RBP for related drug groups in Australia. This review summarises the current state of knowledge on RBP from the published experiences in the countries where RBP has been adopted. The published systematic reviews of RBP from the countries that have implemented it suggest that RBP has been successful at temporarily capping drug prices for the RBP drug groups and achieving short term cost savings. However, other factors influencing total pharmaceutical expenditure have often occurred simultaneously and make it difficult to isolate specific effects of RBP. Further investigation is required before any valid conclusions can be drawn about the net effect of RBP on healthcare costs. RBP has withstood the initial legal challenges of pharmaceutical companies and the criticisms of some clinicians. Where the reference price is based on the lowest priced drug(s) in the group, RBP appears to be one of the few strategies likely to be effective at encouraging doctors to use the least expensive agents as first-line therapy and utilise more expensive agents in those who experience side effects or poor efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.