Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12141885›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2002

On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations.

John M Inadomi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00057174 (Economic Impact of Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00057174 nacompletednot on this map

Economic Impact of Guidelines for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsEnrolled484ConditionsGastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Health EconomicsArmsDisease management of gastroesophageal reflux disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John M InadomiVA Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research and the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA. jinadomi@umich.edu
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a prevalent condition characterised by frequent relapses, long-term costs of management for this disease are high. Thus, strategies to decrease resource expenditures without impairing patient quality of life are desirable. On-demand therapy (one-dose when symptoms occur) and intermittent therapy (short course of medication when symptoms occur) are attractive since pharmaceutical expenditures may be decreased, and many patients self-employ this strategy. The purpose of this paper was to examine the economic implications of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD. A review of selected studies evaluating medication suitable for on-demand or intermittent administration was performed. A complete search for published studies on the cost effectiveness of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD was conducted, and the results discussed in detail. Antacids, alginates, topically active agents, histamine(2)-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors have all demonstrable efficacy compared with placebo when administered on-demand. Proton pump inhibitors constitute the most effective pharmacological means to treat GORD. Although step-up strategies initially using less potent medication may decrease resource use, cost-effectiveness analysis illustrates that on-demand or intermittent therapy with proton pump inhibitors may be reasonable options. Further work that defines quality of life and patient preferences associated with GORD may allow for proper allocation of resources for the management of this condition.

Indexed as

Proton Pump InhibitorsAntacidsClinical Trials as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisCost of IllnessDrug CostsEnzyme InhibitorsGastroesophageal RefluxGastrointestinal AgentsHistamine H2 AntagonistsHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTreatment OutcomeAntacidsEnzyme InhibitorsGastrointestinal AgentsHistamine H2 AntagonistsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID12141885
OpenAlexW1988750799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.