ArticleAtencion primaria
[Influence of patient's sex on the quality of medicine taken].
Article in Atencion primaria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Medicine consumption in the adult population: Influence of self-medication].Atencion primaria · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyse the relationship between patient's sex and quality of medicine taken by monitoring the most pertinent predictive variables.
designObservational cross-sectional study.
settingThirteen Health Centres in the Community of Valencia.
participantsAdult users, selected by consecutive sampling. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: A semi-structured questionnaire collected the following variables: social and personal details, use of medicines for health problems, frequency of use of services, and place where prescription was issued. The quality of the medication was measured by its intrinsic value (IV).
results412 of the 812 patients were women. Men took more medication with a high IV, and women more with an unacceptable IV. Women over 45 took more medication with a not-high IV. Multivariate analysis showed: a) women took one and a half times more medicines with a not-high IV than men, with differences not significant, and b) in the 45-64 age-group, being a woman operated as a modifier of effect, increasing prevalence of consumption of not-high IV to two and a half times more than men. This was adjusted for frequency of attendance, health problems and where the prescription was issued.
conclusionsThe study helped clarify the influence of gender on the quality of medicine, by pointing to the greater likelihood of women between 45 and 64 taking lower-quality medication. In addition, it showed the effect of where the prescription was issued and of health problems on explaining this difference in consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.