Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12139708›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2002

Radiation-induced oral mucositis in mice: strain differences.

W Dörr, K Spekl, M Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systemic administration of heparin ameliorates radiation-induced oral mucositis-preclinical studies in mice.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Reduced intensity conditioning and oral care measures prevent oral mucositis and reduces days of hospitalization in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W DörrKlinik and Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie and Radioonkologie, Medizinische fakultät Carl Gustav Carus der Technishen Universität, D-01307 Dresden, Germany. doerr@rcs.urz.tu-dresden.de
K Spekl
M Martin
Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was initiated to investigate strain differences in oral mucosal radiosensitivity in mice with regard to induction of clinically manifest ulceration. Mouse ventral tongue epithelium was used as an established animal model for radiobiological studies of radiation-induced mucositis. Mice from two different strains, C3H/Neu (n = 40) from the Dresden colony, and B6D2F1 (n = 50) from the Harlan/Winkelmann UK colony were subjected to irradiation of tongue mucosa. Graded single doses were applied to a 3 x 3 mm2 test field in the centre of the lower tongue with 25 kV X-rays in order to generate full dose-effect curves for acute mucosal ulceration, as a clinically relevant reaction. For both groups, dose-effect curves were computed by logit analysis; comparison of the curves was by maximum-likelihood chi2 test. In addition, the time course of ulceration, i.e. latent time and individual ulcer duration, was analysed. In both mouse strains, a well-defined dose effect was observed. The ED50 values, i.e. the doses at which ulceration is expected in 50% of the animals irradiated, and their standard deviation sigma, calculated by logit analysis, can be used to describe radiosensitivity. The ED50 was 11.0 +/- 3.4 Gy (95% confidence interval (7.2; 15.4), P for dose dependence: 0.014) and 13.4 +/- 3.6 Gy (95% confidence interval (10.6; 16.1), P for dose dependence: 0.0002) in C3H and BDF1 mice, respectively. Hence, oral mucosa in BDF1 mice was found to be marginally more radioresistant (P = 0.1). The latent time to ulceration, i.e. the time between irradiation and first diagnosis of ulcer, was 11.6 +/- 0.2 days (mean +/- SEM, n = 18) in C3H mice and 5.6 +/- 0.1 days (n = 27) in BDF1 mice (P = 0.0001). Both were independent of dose (PC3H = 0.94, PBDF1 = 0.33) and hence were calculated for all responding animals of the respective strain. Ulcer duration was 2.8 +/- 0.2 days and 2.4 +/- 0.1 days in C3H and B6 mice, respectively, and was also independent of dose (PC3H = 0.25, PBDF1 = 0.99), but was dependent on the mouse strain (P = 0.036). In conclusion, no statistically significant difference in oral mucosal radiosensitivity was observed between the mouse strains. This, however, may be attributed to the small number of animals used per dose group. The time course data, with a shorter latency and ulcer duration in BDF1 mice, are in good accordance with the higher proliferation rates reported for oral mucosa in this mouse strain.

Indexed as

AnimalsEpithelial CellsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBAMouth MucosaRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalSpecies SpecificityStomatitisTongue

Identifiers

PMID12139708
PMCPMC6496504
OpenAlexW2085861254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.