Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12137666›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants.

S Brown, R Small, B Faber, A Krastev, P Davis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04422041 (Comparison of Early Versus Very Early Postnatal Discharge on Hospital Readmissions in Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04422041 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Early Versus Very Early Postnatal Discharge on Hospital Readmissions in Newborns: A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonRan2016 to 2018Enrolled354ConditionsHospital Readmission, Newborn Morbidity, Newborn Complication, NewbornArmsTime to discharge less than 24 hours, Discharge time between 24 and 48 hours
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Impact of Complex Quality-Interventions on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Early discharge from maternity ward in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on emergency attendance.Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie · 2023
    Article
  17. Maternal near miss: before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Challenges and Feasibility of Co-Design Methods for Improving Parent Information in Maternity Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S BrownCentre for the Study of Mothers' and Children's Health, 251 Faraday Street, Carlton, Victoria, Australia. stephanie@latrobe.edu.au
R Small
B Faber
A Krastev
P Davis
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AULa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLength of postnatal hospital stay has declined dramatically in the past thirty years. There is ongoing controversy concerning whether or not staying less time in hospital is harmful or beneficial.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the safety, impact and effectiveness of a policy of early discharge for healthy mothers and term infants, with respect to the health and well-being of mothers and babies, satisfaction with postnatal care, overall costs of health care and broader impacts on families. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (April 2002), the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group specialised register of clinical trials, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to 2001), CINAHL (1982 to 2001), EMBASE (1988 to 1993) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials comparing early discharge from hospital of healthy mothers and term infants, of greater than or equal to 2500 grams, with standard care in the settings in which trials were conducted. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were abstracted independently by all five reviewers. MAIN

resultsEight trials were identified involving 3600 women. There was substantial variation in the definition of 'early discharge', and the extent of antenatal preparation and midwife home care following discharge offered to women in intervention and control groups. Five trials recruited and randomized women in pregnancy, three randomized women following childbirth. Post randomization exclusions were high. Protocol violations occurred in both directions. No statistically significant differences in infant or maternal readmissions were found in six trials reporting data on these outcomes. Three trials had mixed results showing either no significant difference or results favouring early discharge for the outcome of maternal depression although none used a well-validated standardised instrument. The results of six trials showed that early discharge had no impact on breastfeeding although significant heterogeneity was present between studies. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe findings are inconclusive. There is no evidence of adverse outcomes associated with policies of early postnatal discharge, but methodological limitations of included studies mean that adverse outcomes cannot be ruled out. It remains unclear how important midwifery support at home is to the safety and acceptability of early discharge. Large well-designed trials of early discharge programs incorporating process evaluation to assess the uptake of co-interventions, and using standardised approaches to outcome assessment are needed.

Indexed as

Length of StayPostpartum PeriodFemaleHumansInfantPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID12137666
OpenAlexW1874832584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.