Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12137653›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents.

V C Marinho, J P Higgins, S Logan, A Sheiham

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Guidelines on the use of fluoride in children: an EAPD policy document.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2009
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Development of dental caries and risk factors between 1 and 7 years of age in areas of high risk for dental caries in Stockholm, Sweden.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021
    Trial
  11. Self-assembling Peptide PJournal of dental research · 2018
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V C MarinhoRua Herculano dr Freitas - 957/302, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, vcmarinho@yahoo.com
J P Higgins
S Logan
A Sheiham

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopically applied fluoride varnishes have been used extensively as an operator-applied caries-preventive intervention for over two decades.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness and safety of fluoride varnishes in the prevention of dental caries in children and to examine factors potentially modifying their effect. SEARCH STRATEGY: Multiple electronic database searches, reference lists of articles, journal handsearch, selected authors and manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials with blind outcome assessment, comparing fluoride varnish with placebo or no treatment in children up to 16 years during at least one year. The main outcome was caries increment measured by the change in decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (D(M)FS). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Inclusion decisions, quality assessment and data extraction were duplicated in a random sample of one third of studies, and consensus achieved by discussion or a third party. Study authors were contacted for missing data. The primary measure of effect was the prevented fraction (PF), that is the difference in caries increments between the treatment and control groups expressed as a percentage of the increment in the control group. Random effects meta-analyses were performed where data could be pooled. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random effects meta-regression analyses. MAIN

resultsNine studies were included, involving 2709 children. For the seven that contributed data for the main meta-analysis, the D(M)FS pooled prevented fraction estimate was 46% (95% CI, 30% to 63%; p<0.0001). There was substantial heterogeneity, confirmed statistically (p<0.0001). The pooled d(e/m)fs prevented fraction estimate was 33% (95% CI, 19% to 48%; p<0.0001). No significant association between estimates of D(M)FS prevented fractions and baseline caries severity or background exposure to fluorides was found in meta-regression, and a funnel plot of the seven studies indicated no relationship between prevented fraction and study precision. In both methods, power is limited when only a few trials are included. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe review suggests a substantial caries-inhibiting effect of fluoride varnish in both the permanent and the deciduous dentitions based largely on trials with no treatment controls. There is little information concerning acceptability of treatment or possible side effects in the included trials. Given the relatively poor quality of most of the included studies and the wide confidence intervals around the estimates of effect, there remains a need for further trials. It is important that these trials should be of high quality and include assessment of potential adverse effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildDental CariesFluorides, TopicalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFluorides, Topical

Identifiers

PMID12137653
OpenAlexW4246768334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.