Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12137635›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term.

V Flenady, J King

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Pregnancy in HIV-positive patients: effects on vaginal flora.Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2012
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V FlenadyCentre for Clinical Studies-Women's and Children's Health, Women's and Children's Health Service, Mater Hospital, Raymond Tce, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. vflenady@mater.org.au
J King
Mater Children's Hospital · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrelabour rupture of the membranes at or near term (term PROM) increases the risk of infection for the woman and her baby. The routine use of antibiotics for women at the time of term PROM may reduce this risk. However, due to increasing problems with bacterial resistance and the risk of maternal anaphylaxis with antibiotic use, it is important to assess the evidence addressing risks and benefits in order to ensure judicious use of antibiotics. This review was undertaken to assess the balance of risks and benefits to the mother and infant of antibiotic prophylaxis for prelabour rupture of the membranes at or near term.

objectivesTo assess the effects of antibiotics administered prophylactically to women with prelabour rupture of the membranes at 36 weeks or beyond, on maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's specialised register of controlled trials (October 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1965 to 2001). Other sources included contacting recognised experts and cross referencing relevant material. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials which compared outcomes for women and infants when antibiotics were administered prophylactically for prelabour rupture of the membranes at or near term, with outcomes for controls (placebo or no treatment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Assessment of trial quality and data extraction were undertaken independently by the two authors who then compared and resolved differences. Additional data were received from the investigators of included trials. Meta-analysis was undertaken using a fixed effects model and results are presented using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) (where appropriate) for categorical data, and mean difference (MD) for variables measured on a continuous scale. All results are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN

resultsThe results of two trials, involving a total of 838 women, are included in this review. The use of antibiotics resulted in a statistically significant reduction in maternal infectious morbidity (chorioamnionitis or endometritis): RR 0.43 (95% CI 0.23, 0.82), RD -4% (95% CI -7%, -1%), NNT 25 (95% CI 14 -100). No statistically significant differences were shown for outcomes of neonatal morbidity. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsNo clear practice recommendations can be drawn from the results of this review on this clinically important question, related to a paucity of reliable data. Further well designed randomised controlled trials are needed to assess the effects of routine use of maternal antibiotics for women with prelabour rupture of the membranes at or near term.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisBacterial InfectionsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID12137635
OpenAlexW4256046122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.