Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12137623›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation.

T Lancaster, L F Stead

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04107753 (The Impact of Brief Motivational Counseling for Smoking Cessation in an Italian Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 231 papers, 32 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 32 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04107753 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Brief Motivational Counseling for Smoking Cessation in an Italian Emergency Department: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo AvogadroRan2017 to 2019Enrolled480ConditionsSmoking HabitArmsBrief counseling based on the 5As model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 32 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for smokeless tobacco use cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Behavioral Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Interventions for tobacco use cessation in people living with HIV.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. What Are the Effective Components of Group-Based Treatment Programs For Smoking Cessation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Proactive Referral to Behavioral Smoking Cessation Programs by Healthcare Staff: A Systematic Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Pooled it
  9. Smoking Cessation Interventions in Indigenous North Americans: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. IntensiveEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Smoking Cessation Apps: A Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T LancasterICRF General Practice Research Group, Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF. tim.lancaster@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
L F Stead

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual counselling from a smoking cessation specialist may help smokers to make a successful attempt to stop smoking.

objectivesThe objective of the review is to determine the effects of individual counselling. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group trials register for studies with counsel* in any field. Date of the most recent search: February 2002. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials with at least one treatment arm consisting of face to face individual counselling from a health care worker not involved in routine clinical care. The outcome was smoking cessation at follow-up at least six months after the start of counselling. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers extracted data. The intervention and population, method of randomisation and completeness of follow-up were recorded. MAIN

resultsWe identified eighteen trials. Fifteen compared individual counselling to a minimal intervention, four compared different types or intensities of counselling. Individual counselling was more effective than control. The odds ratio for successful smoking cessation was 1.62 (95% confidence interval 1.35 to 1.94). We failed to detect a greater effect of intensive counselling compared to brief counselling (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.56). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsSmoking cessation counselling can assist smokers to quit.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyCounselingSmoking PreventionHumansPsychotherapy, GroupRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.