Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12136002›Full record

ArticleGenetics2002

Evidence that selected amplification of a bacterial lac frameshift allele stimulates Lac(+) reversion (adaptive mutation) with or without general hypermutability.

E Susan Slechta, Jing Liu, Dan I Andersson, John R Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multiple pathways of selected gene amplification during adaptive mutation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adaptive mutation in Escherichia coli.Journal of bacteriology · 2004
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E Susan SlechtaDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Jing Liu
Dan I Andersson
John R Roth
University of Utah · USSwedish Institute · SE

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF BACTERIAL CHROMSOME STRUCTURER01GM027068 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ROTH, JOHN R · 1985 to 2018
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 27068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the genetic system of Cairns and Foster, a nongrowing population of an E. coli lac frameshift mutant appears to specifically accumulate Lac(+) revertants when starved on medium including lactose (adaptive mutation). This behavior has been attributed to stress-induced general mutagenesis in a subpopulation of starved cells (the hypermutable state model). We have suggested that, on the contrary, stress has no direct effect on mutability but favors only growth of cells that amplify their leaky mutant lac region (the amplification mutagenesis model). Selection enhances reversion primarily by increasing the mutant lac copy number within each developing clone on the selection plate. The observed general mutagenesis is attributed to a side effect of growth with an amplification-induction of SOS by DNA fragments released from a tandem array of lac copies. Here we show that the S. enterica version of the Cairns system shows SOS-dependent general mutagenesis and behaves in every way like the original E. coli system. In both systems, lac revertants are mutagenized during selection. Eliminating the 35-fold increase in mutation rate reduces revertant number only 2- to 4-fold. This discrepancy is due to continued growth of amplification cells until some clones manage to revert without mutagenesis solely by increasing their lac copy number. Reversion in the absence of mutagenesis is still dependent on RecA function, as expected if it depends on lac amplification (a recombination-dependent process). These observations support the amplification mutagenesis model.

Indexed as

Frameshift MutationBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliGene AmplificationGenotypeLac OperonLactoseLexA Repressor ProteinSerine EndopeptidasesTime FactorsBacterial ProteinsLactoseLexA Repressor ProteinSerine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID12136002
PMCPMC1462195
OpenAlexW2124230728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.