ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2002
Patterned variation in murine MHC promoters.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positive selection in coding regions and motif duplication in regulatory regions of bottlenose dolphin MHC class II genes.PloS one · 2018Article
- The functional importance of sequence versus expression variability of MHC alleles in parasite resistance.Genetica · 2012Article
- The chicken BF1 (classical MHC class I) gene shows evidence of selection for diversity in expression and in promoter and signal peptide regions.Immunogenetics · 2009Article
- Allelic combinations of promoter and exon 2 in DQB1 in dogs and wolves.Journal of molecular evolution · 2008Article
- Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity reduces fitness in experimentally infected mice.Genetics · 2007Article
- An ancient balanced polymorphism in a regulatory region of human major histocompatibility complex is retained in Chinese minorities but lost worldwide.American journal of human genetics · 2006Article
- MHC promoter polymorphism in grey wolves and domestic dogs.Immunogenetics · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To compare variation in regulatory and coding DNA, promoter sequences have been obtained from wild-derived mice and laboratory rats. The sequences are from the proximal promoter of the H2Aa, H2Ab, H2Eb, and H2K genes of 24 wild-derived inbred strains and a sample of the corresponding exon 2 sequences and of the RT1.Ba gene of six strains of laboratory rat. They reveal a high level of variation in the mouse MHC class II promoters (H2A and H2E), a low level in MHC class I (H2K), and none in the rat. The variation is pronounced in and around the cAMP response element, a major binding site for modulating promoter activity in response to external stimulation. This finding, together with the different levels of variation in MHC classes I and II, is suggestive of natural selection. However, selection operating via the MHC coding sequences must also contribute, as indicated by the minimal variation in both the MHC class II promoter and coding sequences of the rat. Furthermore CIITA (trans-activator of class II) of the mouse has been reported to have minimal variation in its promoter and none in its coding sequence. Taken together these data suggest that the regulatory and coding sequences undergo coselection. Each of the mouse class II promoters has a pattern of variation that appears to be basically dimorphic, with further variation added by recombination/mutation. The dimorphic allelic lineages are in marginally detectable linkage disequilibrium with the exon 2 sequences, particularly in H2Aa, thus lending further support to the coevolution hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.