Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12133160›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2002

Receipt of preventive services among privately insured minorities in managed care versus fee-for-service insurance plans.

David E DeLaet, Steven Shea, Olveen Carrasquillo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Race differences in access to health care and disparities in incident chronic kidney disease in the US.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Reducing disparities downstream: prospects and challenges.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008
    Article
  9. Nativity and cardiovascular disease screening practices.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2006
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David E DeLaetDivision of General Medicine, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Steven Shea
Olveen Carrasquillo
Columbia University · US

Funding

NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDT32PE010012 · PE · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHEA, STEVEN J · 1994 to 1997
–
BHP HRSA HHS T32 PE10012-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe compare preventive services utilization among privately insured African Americans and Hispanics in managed care organizations (MCOs) versus fee-for-service (FFS) plans. We also examine racial/ethnic disparities in the receipt of preventive services among enrollees in FFS or MCO plans.

designAnalysis of the nationally representative 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

participantsParticipants included 1,120 Hispanic, 929 African-American, and 6,383 non-Hispanic white (NHW) adults age 18 to 64 years with private health insurance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsWe examined self-reported receipt of physical examination, blood pressure measurement, cholesterol assessment, Papanicolau testing, screening mammography, and breast and prostate examinations. Multivariate modeling was used to adjust for age, gender, education, household income, and health status. Hispanics in MCOs were more likely than their FFS counterparts to report having preventive services, with adjusted differences ranging from 5 to 19 percentage points (P <.05 for physical examination, blood pressure measurement, breast examination and Pap smear). Among African Americans, such patterns were of a smaller magnitude. In both MCOs and FFS plans the proportion of African Americans reporting preventive services was equal to or greater than NHWs. In contrast, among Hispanic women in FFS, a non-statistically significant trend of fewer cancer screening tests than NHW's was observed (Pap smears 75% vs 80%; mammograms 66% vs 74%, respectively). In both MCO and FFS plans, Hispanics were less likely than NHWs to report having blood pressure and cholesterol measurement (P <.05).

conclusionsWith the demise of traditional MCOs, reform efforts should incorporate those aspects of MCOs that were associated with greater preventive service utilization, particularly among Hispanics. Existing ethnic disparities warrant further attention.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleManaged Care ProgramsMiddle AgedMinority GroupsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreventive Health ServicesPrivate SectorSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID12133160
PMCPMC1495058
OpenAlexW1972646037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.