Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12122146›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2002

Spatial heterogeneity of transmembrane potential responses of single guinea-pig cardiac cells during electric field stimulation.

Vinod Sharma, Leslie Tung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vinod SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Leslie Tung
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

ELECTRICAL EXCITATION OF CARDIAC MUSCLER01HL048266 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TUNG, LESLIE · 1993 to 2001
$549k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL48266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in transmembrane voltage (V(m)) of cardiac cells during electric field stimulation have a complex spatial- and time-dependent behaviour that differs significantly from electrical stimulation of space-clamped membranes by current pulses. A multisite optical mapping system was used to obtain 17 or 25 microm resolution maps of V(m) along the long axis of guinea-pig ventricular cells (n = 57) stained with voltage-sensitive dye (di-8-ANEPPS) and stimulated longitudinally with uniform electric field (2, 5 or 10 ms, 3-62 V cm(-1)) pulses (n = 201). The initial polarizations of V(m) responses (V(mr)) varied linearly along the cell length and reversed symmetrically upon field reversal. The remainder of the V(m) responses had parallel time courses among the recording sites, revealing a common time-varying signal component (V(ms)). V(ms) was depolarizing for pulses during rest and hyperpolarizing for pulses during the early plateau phase. V(ms) varied in amplitude and time course with increasing pulse amplitude. Four types of plateau response were observed, with transition points between the different responses occurring when the maximum polarization at the ends of the cell reached values estimated as 60, 110 and 220 mV. Among the cells that had a polarization change of > 200 mV at their ends (for fields > 45 V cm(-1)), some (n = 17/25) had non-parallel time courses among V(m) recordings of the various sites. This implied development of an intracellular field (E(i)) that was found to increase exponentially with time (tau = 7.2 +/- 3.2 ms). Theoretical considerations suggest that V(ms) represents the intracellular potential (phi(i)) as well as the average polarization of the cell, and that V(mr) is the manifestation of the extracellular potential gradient resulting from the field stimulus. For cells undergoing field stimulation, phi(i) acts as the cellular physiological state variable and substitutes for V(m), which is the customary variable for space-clamped membranes.

Indexed as

AnimalsColoring AgentsElectric StimulationGuinea PigsHeartKineticsMaleMembrane PotentialsMyocardiumPatch-Clamp TechniquesColoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID12122146
PMCPMC2290429
OpenAlexW2120316133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.