Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12121933›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2002

Efficacy of caspofungin alone and in combination with voriconazole in a Guinea pig model of invasive aspergillosis.

William R Kirkpatrick, Sofia Perea, Brent J Coco, Thomas F Patterson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Salvage combination antifungal therapy for acute invasive aspergillosis may improve outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pulmonary aspergillosis: diagnosis and treatment.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review on Current Status of Echinocandins Use.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Animal Models of Aspergillosis.Comparative medicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William R KirkpatrickDepartment of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, Mail Code 7881, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. KIRKPATRICK@UTHSCSA.EDU
Sofia Perea
Brent J Coco
Thomas F Patterson
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antifungal activity of caspofungin acetate (CAS) alone and in combination with voriconazole (VRC) was evaluated in an immunosuppressed transiently neutropenic guinea pig model of invasive aspergillosis. Guinea pigs were immunosuppressed with triamcinolone at 20 mg/kg of body weight/day subcutaneously beginning 4 days prior to lethal intravenous challenge with Aspergillus fumigatus and were made temporarily neutropenic with cyclophosphamide administered at 150 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.) 1 day prior to challenge. Therapy with i.p. CAS at 1 and 2.5 mg/kg/day (with and without oral VRC at 5 mg/kg/day), oral VRC at 5 mg/kg/day, or i.p. amphotericin B (AMB) at 1.25 mg/kg/day was begun 24 h after challenge and was continued for 5 days. Mortality occurred in 12 of 12 untreated controls, whereas mortality occurred in 4 of 12 and 6 of 12 guinea pigs treated with CAS at 1 and 2.5 mg/kg/day, respectively, and in 3 of 12 guinea pigs treated with AMB. No mortality occurred among animals treated with CAS at 1 mg/kg/day plus VRC at 5 mg/kg/day, CAS at 2.5 mg/kg/day plus VRC at 5 mg/kg/day, or VRC at 5 mg/kg/day alone. Both CAS regimens increased the survival times and reduced the colony counts in tissue compared with those for the controls. Treatment with VRC and AMB significantly reduced the colony counts in the tissues of selected animals compared with those in the tissues of the controls. Treatment with VRC and AMB also resulted in reductions in colony counts in tissues compared with those in the tissues of animals treated with CAS (the difference was not statistically significant) and improved the survival times but did not sterilize tissues. Combination therapies with CAS plus VRC at either dose reduced colony counts in tissues 1,000-fold over those for the controls and were the only regimens that significantly reduced the numbers of positive cultures. The combinations of CAS plus VRC were highly effective in this model and should be further evaluated for use against invasive aspergillosis.

Indexed as

PeptidesPeptides, CyclicAmphotericin BAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisCaspofunginDrug Therapy, CombinationEchinocandinsGuinea PigsLipopeptidesMaleOrgan Culture TechniquesPyrimidinesSurvival AnalysisAmphotericin BAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsLipopeptidesPeptidesPeptides, CyclicPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID12121933
PMCPMC127374
OpenAlexW2129942501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.