ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2002
Simple fibroblast-based assay for screening of new antimicrobial drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-throughput screening system for antimycobacterial compounds usingMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Article
- Uptake-independent killing of macrophages by extracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis aggregates.The EMBO journal · 2023Article
- In Silico Pharmacokinetic Profiling of the Identified Bioactive Metabolites ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Small Molecules That Sabotage Bacterial Virulence.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2017Review
- Phenotypic profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis EspA point mutants reveals that blockage of ESAT-6 and CFP-10 secretion in vitro does not always correlate with attenuation of virulence.Journal of bacteriology · 2013Article
- Synthesis of N-substituted 2-[(1E)-alkenyl]-4-(1H)-quinolone derivatives as antimycobacterial agents against non-tubercular mycobacteria.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2011Article
- Simple fibroblast-based assay to test the pyrazinamide susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we propose a simple and reproducible host-cell-based assay for the screening of antimycobacterial drugs that is suitable for drug discovery. The method evaluates both antimycobacterial activity of the drugs and their cytotoxicity to host cells. The basis of this simple fibroblast-based assay (SFA) is that cells of human lung fibroblast cell line MRC-5, which are highly sensitive to mycobacterial cytotoxicity, are killed by virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H(37)Rv bacilli in response to the viability of bacilli. Clinically used antimycobacterial drugs inhibited the mycobacterial cytotoxicity to MRC-5 cells in a dose-dependent manner. MICs of isoniazid, streptomycin, rifampin, and ethambutol determined by this SFA (0.428, 1.816, 0.013, and 3.465 microg/ml, respectively) were within 1 log of MICs determined by the broth dilution test (BDT) using Middlebrook 7H9 medium. The MIC of pyrazinamide, which exhibits bactericidal activity only at a high dose by BDT (1,231 microg/ml at pH 6.6 and 492 microg/ml at pH 5.8), was 3.847 microg/ml in the modified method of SFA. On the other hand, sodium azide, a toxic agent for both mammalian cells and bacteria, exhibited cytotoxicity to fibroblasts at a dose lower than that required to inhibit mycobacterial growth. Thus, this fibroblast-based method enabled us to evaluate both antibacterial activity of drugs and their cytotoxicity to human cells within a short period of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.