Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12121921›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2002

Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods of broth microdilution MIC end point determination and evaluation of a sterol quantitation method for in vitro susceptibility testing of fluconazole and itraconazole against trailing and nontrailing Candida isolates.

Beth A Arthington-Skaggs, Wendy Lee-Yang, Meral A Ciblak, Joao P Frade, Mary E Brandt, Rana A Hajjeh, Lee H Harrison, Andre N Sofair, David W Warnock, Candidemia Active Surveillance Group

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of the antagonistic effect ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fungistatic Effect of Phthalide Lactones onMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of the Anti-Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  11. Raman Spectroscopy of OralInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. In Vitro Anti-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  19. Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Beth A Arthington-SkaggsMycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. BSkaggs@cdc.gov
Wendy Lee-Yang
Meral A Ciblak
Joao P Frade
Mary E Brandt
Rana A Hajjeh
Lee H Harrison
Andre N Sofair
David W Warnock
Candidemia Active Surveillance Group
National Center for Infectious Diseases · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual determination of MIC end points for azole antifungal agents can be complicated by the trailing growth phenomenon. To determine the incidence of trailing growth, we performed testing of in vitro susceptibility to fluconazole and itraconazole using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution M27-A reference procedure and 944 bloodstream isolates of seven Candida spp., obtained through active population-based surveillance between 1998 and 2000. Of 429 C. albicans isolates, 78 (18.2%) showed trailing growth at 48 h in tests with fluconazole, and 70 (16.3%) showed trailing in tests with itraconazole. Of 118 C. tropicalis isolates, 70 (59.3%) showed trailing growth in tests with fluconazole, and 35 (29.7%) showed trailing in tests with itraconazole. Trailing growth was not observed with any of the other five Candida spp. tested (C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, and C. parapsilosis). To confirm whether or not isolates that showed trailing growth in fluconazole and/or itraconazole were resistant in vitro to these agents, all isolates that showed trailing growth were retested by the sterol quantitation method, which measures cellular ergosterol content rather than growth inhibition after exposure to azoles. By this method, none of the trailing isolates was resistant in vitro to fluconazole or itraconazole. For both agents, a 24-h visual end point or a spectrophotometric end point of 50% reduction in growth relative to the growth control after 24 or 48 h of incubation correlated most closely with the result of sterol quantitation. Our results indicate that MIC results determined by either of these end point rules may be more predictive of in vivo outcome for isolates that give unclear visual end points at 48 h due to trailing growth.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasisEndpoint DeterminationErgosterolFluconazoleIndicator Dilution TechniquesItraconazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpectrophotometrySterolsAntifungal AgentsErgosterolFluconazoleItraconazoleSterols

Identifiers

PMID12121921
PMCPMC127334
OpenAlexW2020586027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.