Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12120974›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science

Patients' views on out-of-hours care in general practice in Dublin.

S Smith, J Lynch, K O'Doherty, G Bury

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S SmithDepartment of General Practice, University College Dublin, Rialto Medical Centre, Ireland. susan.smith@iol.ie
J Lynch
K O'Doherty
G Bury

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known regarding patients' views and levels of satisfaction with out-of-hours care in Irish general practice despite significant recent changes in service delivery.

aimsThis study aimed to record patients' experience of out-of-hours care on a specific occasion and elicit their satisfaction with out-of-hours care in general.

methodsPatients requesting out-of-hours care in three south inner city Dublin practices in June and July 2000 were identified and sent an anonymous postal questionnaire.

resultsTwo hundred and forty patients were identified and 58% responded to the questionnaire. The approximate call rate was 195 calls per 1,000 patients per year. Sixty-one per cent of patients used the co-operative service, 28% received a house call and 3% received telephone advice only; 86% are currently satisfied with out-of-hours care.

conclusionsThe majority of patients are satisfied with the current out-of-hours service. Telephone consultation rates are significantly lower than other countries. These findings need to be considered before the widespread introduction of systems involving increased telephone consultations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFamily PracticeGroup PracticeHumansIrelandMiddle AgedNight CarePatient SatisfactionPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPrimary Health CareTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID12120974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.