Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12117457›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2002

Fixed low-dose combination therapy for hypertension.

Bernard Waeber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Treating stage 2 hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernard WaeberUniversity Hospital, Division of Clinical Pathophysiology, PPA BH-19, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. bwaeber@chuv.hospvd.ch
University Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of various classes of antihypertensive agents that lower blood pressure by different primary actions, the treatment of hypertension remains a difficult task. Essential hypertension has a highly heterogeneous character, so that monotherapies are often not sufficient to normalize blood pressure. This is especially true since the goal of treatment is currently to normalize both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. By combining medications acting by different mechanisms, it is possible to gain considerably in terms of antihypertensive efficacy because of synergistic impacts on the cardiovascular system. Furthermore, low doses of antihypertensive agents are generally sufficient when used in combination, which accounts for the excellent tolerability of combination products. Fixed low-dose combinations are very useful tools for treating hypertensive patients. Because of their simplicity of use, and the fact that they improve the blood pressure response rate while minimizing the incidence of adverse effects, such combinations are increasingly being considered as suitable for both second-line and first-line therapy.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureClinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsHumansHypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID12117457
OpenAlexW2016826630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.