Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12114775›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology1998

Clonality of Endocrine Proliferative Lesions: A Critical Reappraisal.

Ronald A. DeLellis, Arthur S. Tischler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald A. DeLellis
Arthur S. Tischler
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distinction between nodular hyperplasia and benign tumors of the endocrine system is problematical. Although numerous parameters including lesional size, multicentricity and histological features have been suggested as distinguishing criteria, none of these is absolute. Analyses based on X-chromosome inactivation have provided conflicting results with respect to the clonal origins of these lesions, and at least some lesions conventionally classified as hyperplastic nodules appear to be monoclonal, Although clonality has been generally equated with neoplasia, it is likely that clonal expansion of genetically normal cells can occur in the endocrine system as a result of a variety of growth of promoting stimuli. Multiparametric studies employing markers for X-chromosome inactivation together with methods for identification of unique non-X-linked genetic alterations will be required to resolve the many questions relating to the pathogenesis of endocrine proliferative lesions.

Identifiers

PMID12114775
OpenAlexW1984811929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.