ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2002
Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.BMC health services research · 2008Pooled it
- Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of informed-choice invitations on diabetes screening knowledge, attitude and intentions: an analogue study.BMC public health · 2010Trial
- Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.BMC public health · 2009Trial
- Do Non-participants at Screening have a Different Threshold for an Acceptable Benefit-Harm Ratio than Participants? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.The patient · 2019Article
- Factors Associated with Uptake of Genetics Services for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Screening Methods and Mortality Data among Hungarian Primary Care Population: Preliminary Results of the First Government-Financed Managed Care Program.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2015Article
- Patients' willingness to attend the NHS cardiovascular health checks in primary care: a qualitative interview study.BMC family practice · 2015Article
- Diversity and ambivalence in general practitioners' attitudes towards preventive health checks - a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2012Article
- Detection of child abuse in emergency departments: a multi-centre study.Archives of disease in childhood · 2011Article
- Cascading bedpans and dodgy MOTs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- Social patterning of screening uptake and the impact of facilitating informed choices: psychological and ethical analyses.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2008Article
- Estimating the high risk group for cardiovascular disease in the Norwegian HUNT 2 population according to the 2003 European guidelines: modelling study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.Sexually transmitted infections · 2005Article
- Evolving the multiple roles of 'patients' in health-care research: reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2003Article
- Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2003Article
- Is opportunistic disease prevention in the consultation ethically justifiable?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
- Primary prevention of coronary heart disease.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.